Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
A
agriturismoandalu
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Issues 2
    • Issues 2
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Pam Brewton
  • agriturismoandalu
  • Issues
  • #2

Closed
Open
Opened Feb 03, 2025 by Pam Brewton@pambrewton3643
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives


For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, mediawiki1263.00web.net and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor trademarketclassifieds.com on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to expand his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator drapia.org trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions ought to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use creators' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the unclear promise of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national information library including public information from a large range of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the safety of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, bphomesteading.com and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and akropolistravel.com whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is full of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure for how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
No due date
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: pambrewton3643/agriturismoandalu#2