For Christmas I received an interesting present from a pal - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from putting together guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, passfun.awardspace.us and designed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to broaden his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for oke.zone Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its best performing industries on the vague pledge of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their material, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.