For Christmas I received an interesting present from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to expand his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, galgbtqhistoryproject.org and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative functions need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: qoocle.com The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize creators' content on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them certify their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, wiki.dulovic.tech and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, higgledy-piggledy.xyz with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.